Wonder what you would find if you frisked NASA’s temperature records?
Answer: By its own admission, NASA’s global warming data is in worse shape than the Climate-gate data!
Click here to read about the Climate-Gate scandal.
Seriously… These climate change scientists just don’t get it: It’s not rocket science! I guess some people will try to convince you of anything if they’re on the verge of getting grant money taken away.
FOX News (I know what you’re thinking, but the liberal mainstream media will never report this kind of breaking news) reports:
NASA was able to put a man on the moon, but the space agency can’t tell you what the temperature was when it did. By its own admission, NASA’s temperature records are in even worse shape than the besmirched Climate-gate data.
E-mail messages obtained by a Freedom of Information Act request reveal that NASA concluded that its own climate findings were inferior to those maintained by both the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) — the scandalized source of the leaked Climate-gate e-mails — and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center.
The e-mails from 2007 reveal that when a USA Today reporter asked if NASA’s data “was more accurate” than other climate-change data sets, NASA’s Dr. Reto A. Ruedy replied with an unequivocal no. He said “the National Climatic Data Center’s procedure of only using the best stations is more accurate,” admitting that some of his own procedures led to less accurate readings.
“NASA’s temperature data is worse than the Climate-gate temperature data. According to NASA,” wrote Christopher Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute who uncovered the e-mails. Horner is skeptical of NCDC’s data as well, stating plainly: “Three out of the four temperature data sets stink.“
Wonderful… If you’re curious about how the “good” folks at NASA could screw up this badly, click on the article link above and read up on it. Personally, I bet most of you will find it quite assuming. Hint: 90% of the thermometers are placed in areas that could easily create a bias influence.
Once again, this proves that global warming is NOT fact. Will this big news story even be reported by the liberal mainstream media? I highly doubt it. Unfortunately, skeptics – like me – will still be labeled as ‘crazies,’ while heat, snow, fog, drought, sleet, rain, lightning, hurricanes, and drunken Easter Bunnies remain obvious signs of global warming. Silly liberals!
Read Full Post »