Video: The REAL Violent And Hateful Political Rhetoric

The REAL hateful rhetoric!

Wonder what you would find if you frisked the hateful and violent political rhetoric before Barack Obama was president?

Answer: The liberal mainstream media actually thought it was cool.

Hmm… So what happened?

It’s quite astonishing that the liberal mainstream media has completely forgot about these popular incidents AFTER President Obama was elected.

So are the Tea Party events like this? Not at all! The mainstream media only wishes it was and is trying their hardest to perceive them as radical crazies. Unfortunately for them, there is no proof. Trying to compare the Tea Parties (innocent) to the liberal Bush presidency protests (disgraceful) is like comparing a G-rated movie to a NC17-rated film.

Props to Evan Coyne Maloney for the video.

Read Full Post »

People Who Watch Sports Are Largely Republican

Wonder what you would find if you frisked Democrats and Republicans?

Answer: There’s an ideological divide in what televised competitions members of each Party watch.

Republicans like to watch golf and college football, while Democrats like to watch the NBA and WNBA… Haha, awesome!

National Journal reports:

GOPers are most likely to watch the PGA Tour, college football and NASCAR, according to the study. But if GOP ad buyers want to reach more frequent voters, they should focus on the PGA; golf fans told researchers they were much more likely to vote than NASCAR fans say they are. Meanwhile, Dems hold the largest advantages among basketball fans, both those who watch the NBA and the WNBA. And fans of World Wrestling Entertainment are also much more likely to favor Dems — if they vote. Wrestling fans are less likely to cast ballots than any other sports fans.

Overall, GOPers hold advantages among die-hard fans of most sports, albeit by slimmer margins than golf fans. Those who watch Major League Baseball and the NFL are only slightly more conservative than the average voter, while those who watch college basketball are about 5% more likely to vote with the GOP.

Among the major sports, college football fans say they are most likely to vote, followed closely by MLB aficianados. NFL fans rate with NASCAR fans as less likely voters. Fans of extreme sports, the WWE, monster trucks and soccer — all of whom tend to be younger — are the least likely to vote, according to the survey.

Since I graduated from Michigan State University with a Bachelor’s of Art in Advertising, this type of study/information is cool (in my mind). It looks like the GOP has an advantage when it comes to advertising during televised sporting events:

The data is fun to peruse, but it has practical implications as well. Ad buyers should focus on sports programming, according to the analysis. That’s because sports fans are most likely to view events live instead of on a DVR machine, meaning they don’t skip the ads.

Dems tend to watch more TV than GOPers, and they dominate most kinds of programming. That means GOP ad buyers have fewer choices, and sports offer the best opportunity to reach their voters.

Check out the graph displaying sports fans’ voting propensity, and which party they prefer:

I’m curious… Do you think the liberal mainstream media will use this information to fuel the stereotypes that they put on Conservatives and Republicans? Whatever though, I will take NASCAR and Motocross over WEE (pro wrestling) and monster trucks any day!

Read Full Post »

NASA Global Warming Data Worse Than Climate-Gate

Wonder what you would find if you frisked NASA’s temperature records?

Answer: By its own admission, NASA’s global warming data is in worse shape than the Climate-gate data!

Click here to read about the Climate-Gate scandal.

Seriously… These climate change scientists just don’t get it: It’s not rocket science! I guess some people will try to convince you of anything if they’re on the verge of getting grant money taken away.

FOX News (I know what you’re thinking, but the liberal mainstream media will never report this kind of breaking news) reports:

NASA was able to put a man on the moon, but the space agency can’t tell you what the temperature was when it did. By its own admission, NASA’s temperature records are in even worse shape than the besmirched Climate-gate data.

E-mail messages obtained by a Freedom of Information Act request reveal that NASA concluded that its own climate findings were inferior to those maintained by both the University of East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU) — the scandalized source of the leaked Climate-gate e-mails — and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center.

The e-mails from 2007 reveal that when a USA Today reporter asked if NASA’s data “was more accurate” than other climate-change data sets, NASA’s Dr. Reto A. Ruedy replied with an unequivocal no. He said “the National Climatic Data Center’s procedure of only using the best stations is more accurate,” admitting that some of his own procedures led to less accurate readings.

[...]

“NASA’s temperature data is worse than the Climate-gate temperature data. According to NASA,” wrote Christopher Horner, a senior fellow at the Competitive Enterprise Institute who uncovered the e-mails. Horner is skeptical of NCDC’s data as well, stating plainly: “Three out of the four temperature data sets stink.“

Wonderful… If you’re curious about how the “good” folks at NASA could screw up this badly, click on the article link above and read up on it. Personally, I bet most of you will find it quite assuming. Hint: 90% of the thermometers are placed in areas that could easily create a bias influence.

Once again, this proves that global warming is NOT fact. Will this big news story even be reported by the liberal mainstream media? I highly doubt it. Unfortunately, skeptics – like me – will still be labeled as ‘crazies,’ while heat, snow, fog, drought, sleet, rain, lightning, hurricanes, and drunken Easter Bunnies remain obvious signs of global warming. Silly liberals!

Read Full Post »