Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for June 8th, 2010

Mike Bouchard for Michigan.

Wonder what you would find if you frisked your local television commercials after Tuesday (June 8, 2010)?

Answer: You might see Republican Gubernatorial candidate Mike Bouchard’s latest political advertisement!

Bouchard for Governor reports:

Mike Bouchard, Republican candidate for governor, launches his 2nd gubernatorial ad summing up Michigan’s frustration with the Granholm administration and the state’s record high unemployment rate.

[...]

“At a time when Michigan is crying out for leadership, the Governor has turned her back on our state,” said Bouchard. “We lead the nation in unemployment and the status quo behavior in Lansing is unacceptable. Families are struggling to hold on to their homes as others on the block lose their grip on the American Dream. As those losses continue to pile up, parents across the state, including my wife and I, are scared our children will be forced to leave Michigan to find jobs and opportunity.

“Each of these families represents a thread that makes up the fabric of our communities. When one thread is ripped out, it affects us all. It is time to make real systemic change to the way our government is run. The next governor will not have a second to lose to make up for the sad legacy of Governor Granholm. I will act with a sense of urgency because it is time we focus on the next generation and not the next election.”

Props to Mike Bouchard! It is good to see a Republican gubernatorial candidate take an approach that doesn’t attack the Republican competition, but instead puts the focus on Democratic Governor Jennifer Granholm and her failed policies.

If you would like more information on Mike Bouchard or donate to his campaign, please click the image below:

Mike Bouchard for Michigan!

Also, don’t forget to…

Click to become of a fan of Frisk A Liberal on Facebook!

Read Full Post »

Wonder what you would find if you frisked a liberal’s knowledge about basic economics?

Answer: They do not have any.

It’s all starting to make sense now!

The Wall Street Journal reports:

Who is better informed about the policy choices facing the country—liberals, conservatives or libertarians? According to a Zogby International survey that I write about in the May issue of Econ Journal Watch, the answer is unequivocal: The left flunks Econ 101.

Zogby researcher Zeljka Buturovic and I considered the 4,835 respondents’ (all American adults) answers to eight survey questions about basic economics. We also asked the respondents about their political leanings: progressive/very liberal; liberal; moderate; conservative; very conservative; and libertarian.

Rather than focusing on whether respondents answered a question correctly, we instead looked at whether they answered incorrectly. A response was counted as incorrect only if it was flatly unenlightened.

Consider one of the economic propositions in the December 2008 poll: “Restrictions on housing development make housing less affordable.” People were asked if they: 1) strongly agree; 2) somewhat agree; 3) somewhat disagree; 4) strongly disagree; 5) are not sure.

Basic economics acknowledges that whatever redeeming features a restriction may have, it increases the cost of production and exchange, making goods and services less affordable. There may be exceptions to the general case, but they would be atypical.

Therefore, we counted as incorrect responses of “somewhat disagree” and “strongly disagree.” This treatment gives leeway for those who think the question is ambiguous or half right and half wrong. They would likely answer “not sure,” which we do not count as incorrect.

In this case, percentage of conservatives answering incorrectly was 22.3%, very conservatives 17.6% and libertarians 15.7%. But the percentage of progressive/very liberals answering incorrectly was 67.6% and liberals 60.1%. The pattern was not an anomaly.

The other questions were: 1) Mandatory licensing of professional services increases the prices of those services (unenlightened answer: disagree). 2) Overall, the standard of living is higher today than it was 30 years ago (unenlightened answer: disagree). 3) Rent control leads to housing shortages (unenlightened answer: disagree). 4) A company with the largest market share is a monopoly (unenlightened answer: agree). 5) Third World workers working for American companies overseas are being exploited (unenlightened answer: agree). 6) Free trade leads to unemployment (unenlightened answer: agree). 7) Minimum wage laws raise unemployment (unenlightened answer: disagree).

How did the six ideological groups do overall? Here they are, best to worst, with an average number of incorrect responses from 0 to 8: Very conservative, 1.30; Libertarian, 1.38; Conservative, 1.67; Moderate, 3.67; Liberal, 4.69; Progressive/very liberal, 5.26.

Americans in the first three categories do reasonably well. But the left has trouble squaring economic thinking with their political psychology, morals and aesthetics.

To be sure, none of the eight questions specifically challenge the political sensibilities of conservatives and libertarians. Still, not all of the eight questions are tied directly to left-wing concerns about inequality and redistribution. In particular, the questions about mandatory licensing, the standard of living, the definition of monopoly, and free trade do not specifically challenge leftist sensibilities.

Yet on every question the left did much worse. On the monopoly question, the portion of progressive/very liberals answering incorrectly (31%) was more than twice that of conservatives (13%) and more than four times that of libertarians (7%). On the question about living standards, the portion of progressive/very liberals answering incorrectly (61%) was more than four times that of conservatives (13%) and almost three times that of libertarians (21%).

The survey also asked about party affiliation. Those responding Democratic averaged 4.59 incorrect answers. Republicans averaged 1.61 incorrect, and Libertarians 1.26 incorrect.

Adam Smith described political economy as “a branch of the science of a statesman or legislator.” Governmental power joined with wrongheadedness is something terrible, but all too common. Realizing that many of our leaders and their constituents are economically unenlightened sheds light on the troubles that surround us.

To be honest, I wish I could say I was surprised… But I can’t. I am not trying to say that Republicans are always correct, but the left really needs to set aside their ideology and start considering actual evidence, rather than feelings, when making economic decisions in the future. If they can do that, perhaps we can start getting this economy and country back on track.

Please pass this blog post or actual article on. Those voters who don’t like making hard decisions must see this information so they are not easily persuaded to support liberal “fantasy-land” solutions to tough economic problems.

Click to become of a fan of Frisk A Liberal on Facebook!

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 26 other followers