Wonder what you would find if you frisked The View’s Whoopi Goldberg over the Roman Polanski issue?
Answer: Polanski didn’t ‘rape-rape’ a 13 year-old girl.
Hmm… Are you joking Whoopi!? I mean, you use to be a comedian so I don’t know if America is suppose to take you serious here. What the hell is ‘rape-rape’? Honestly!?
Here we go again folks, liberal Hollywood coming to a child molester’s rescue! This is why the the debate on The View is absolutely off base:
What I find much more disturbing is that, in that clip and another one that’s posted at Jezebel, the ladies of The View engage in some terrifying “debate” about what happened to then-13-year-old Samantha Geimer. Whoopi floats the notion that rape “wasn’t the allegation,” and that the victim “was aware,” and Melissa Gilbert thinks it makes a difference that “Mom was in the building.”
What the EFF? I hate to even point out the sickeningly obvious here. First of all, “rape-rape” was the allegation. Samantha Geimer testified that she told Polanski “No!” While Polanski denies this, he loses a couple of credibility points by drugging and sodomizing a 13 year old girl. I’d say she gets the benefit of the doubt here.
Notwithstanding that, though, is that the standard of consent now, “She was aware?” Keep an eye on your drinks, ladies, because in Whoopi’s world, the right dose of rohypnol will leave you just conscious enough to have deserved it.
I feel bad for those who have the moral mindset of a moron, like Whoopi Goldberg, because I don’t understand how anyone could have sympathy for someone that would DRUG and “RAPE-RAPE” a child… For crying out loud, it could have been their child!
Common sense people… Please try and use it.